Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Splitting Into Two Companies

Nov 13, 2021
GettyImages 1229247259 9c12f7ed80d14fe78a4eb23daea695d6

Well being care big Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) will divide itself into two publicly traded corporations. One will inherit J&J’s intensive portfolio of well-known client merchandise, whereas the opposite will proceed to develop, produce, and distribute prescribed drugs, medical units, and medical know-how. Johnson & Johnson signifies that the transaction will happen someday over the following 18 to 24 months and that the pharmaceutical, medical units, and medical know-how firm will retain the Jonson & Johnson title.

The preliminary response of the markets was constructive. As of 11:50 a.m. Japanese Customary Time on Nov. 12, 2021, the date of the announcement, shares of JNJ had been up by about 1.3% for the day. Nevertheless, even after this advance, they had been buying and selling 8.2% under their 52-week excessive reached in August 2021.

Key Takeaways

  • Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) will break up into two public corporations throughout the subsequent 18 to 24 months.
  • One will get its many client manufacturers, whereas the opposite will get its prescribed drugs, medical units, and medical know-how companies.
  • The buyer firm is but to be named, whereas the drug firm will preserve the Johnson & Johnson title.
  • The buyer division at the moment generates about $15 billion in annual gross sales, whereas the faster-growing drug unit produces about $77 billion.

Separating Merchandise and Manufacturers

The brand new client merchandise firm, which has but to be named, will personal such well-known manufacturers as Band-Assist bandages, Aveeno and Neutrogena skincare merchandise, Tylenol ache reduction merchandise, JOHNSON’S Child Care merchandise, and Listerine mouthwash, amongst others.

In the meantime, the prescribed drugs, medical units, and medical know-how firm, which can retain the Johnson & Johnson title, may have its one-dose COVID-19 vaccine amongst its many merchandise, in addition to superior medical applied sciences similar to robotics and synthetic intelligence (AI). The incoming CEO of J&J, Joaquin Duato, will head the latter firm when the break up takes place.

J&J signifies that the patron division is projected to generate gross sales of about $15 billion in 2021, whereas the faster-growing prescribed drugs, medical units, and medical know-how unit is on observe to ship about $77 billion in income. J&J’s client division has 4 manufacturers that every produce over $1 billion in annual gross sales. It additionally owns 20 manufacturers that every generate over $150 million in yearly revenues.

A key threat for the patron merchandise firm will probably be litigation claiming that Johnson’s Child Powder is carcinogenic. J&J has denied this declare vigorously.

Strategic Rationale

Outgoing J&J CEO Alex Gorsky stated this in a press release in regards to the deliberate break up of the corporate: “Following a complete evaluation, the board and administration crew consider that the deliberate separation of the patron well being enterprise is one of the simplest ways to speed up our efforts to serve sufferers, customers, and healthcare professionals, create alternatives for our gifted international crew, drive worthwhile development, and—most significantly—enhance healthcare outcomes for individuals around the globe.”

In an interview, Gorsky indicated that J&J’s board has mentioned this transfer for “a while,” and he anticipates that it’s going to produce “large alternative” to stakeholders. He added: “It is in one of the best long-term curiosity of all our stakeholders. Our aim is actually to create two international leaders—a pharmaceutical and medical gadget enterprise that has nice potential in the present day … and naturally, the patron enterprise that is acquired iconic manufacturers.”

Gorsky additionally claimed that the break up can be an particularly constructive improvement for J&J’s intensive lineup of client merchandise. He asserted that, as a separate firm, the patron division may have “much more agility” and “a greater alternative for capital allocation.”