[ad_1]
The athletic attire retailer Lululemon filed a lawsuit in opposition to the health firm Peloton on Monday, accusing it of patent infringement over the designs of a brand new line of leggings and sports activities bras.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Courtroom for the Central District of California, accuses Peloton of commerce costume infringement, false designation of origin and unfair competitors. Lululemon is searching for an injunction in opposition to Peloton in addition to a jury trial, damages and different financial aid.
Peloton and Lululemon ended a co-branding relationship this yr, a break up that Peloton described as amicable, in keeping with court docket paperwork. Peloton launched a brand new attire model in September.
In its swimsuit, Lululemon stated that 5 Peloton-branded ladies’s bra and legging merchandise, together with the Strappy Bra, the Cadent Laser Dot Bra and the Cadent Laser Dot Legging, “had been infringing” on six Lululemon patents.
Lululemon additionally claimed {that a} Peloton product labeled One Luxe Tight was an imitation of one among Lululemon’s finest sellers, the Align Pant. Attorneys for Lululemon and Peloton didn’t instantly reply to requests for touch upon Tuesday.
“In contrast to innovators equivalent to Lululemon, Peloton didn’t spend the time, effort and expense to create an authentic product line,” Lululemon stated in its grievance. “As a substitute, Peloton imitated a number of of Lululemon’s revolutionary designs and offered knockoffs of Lululemon’s merchandise, claiming them as its personal.”
The swimsuit is the newest escalation in a dispute between the 2 common manufacturers. On Nov. 24, Peloton filed a grievance in U.S. District Courtroom for the Southern District of New York, asking for a court docket declaration that it had not infringed on any of Lululemon’s patents.
Peloton stated in its grievance that its merchandise “has clear and apparent variations that enable the merchandise to be simply distinguished” from Lululemon’s merchandise.
On Nov. 11, attorneys for Lululemon despatched a cease-and-desist letter to Peloton saying that the corporate would sue except Peloton stopped promoting “copy-cat merchandise” that infringed on Lululemon’s “design patent and commerce costume rights.”
In its grievance, Peloton stated that Lululemon’s “allegations lack any advantage,” including that the businesses’ “manufacturers and logos are additionally distinctive and well-recognized, making confusion between merchandise a digital impossibility.”
[ad_2]
Supply- nytimes