Phyllis Oakley, Female Pioneer at the State Department, Dies at 87

Jan 30, 2022
00oakley image facebookJumbo

[ad_1]

Phyllis Oakley, whose 25-year diplomatic profession within the State Division virtually didn’t occur due to an unwritten rule that forbade feminine international service officers from marrying, died on Jan. 22 at a hospital in Washington. She was 87.

Her son, Thomas Oakley, confirmed the dying. He mentioned that she had been in good well being however “her coronary heart simply stopped.”

Within the late Nineteen Eighties, because the Chilly Conflict waned, the straight-talking, forthright Ms. Oakley, whose boisterous snicker typically signaled her presence, was a lot within the public eye as deputy spokesman (the time period then in use) for the State Division beneath President Ronald Reagan. She later grew to become assistant secretary for refugees and assistant secretary for intelligence and analysis beneath President Invoice Clinton.

She had begun her profession in 1957. However when she married in 1958, State Division customized dictated that she give up.

Within the late Nineteen Sixties and early ’70s, as ladies began breaking down boundaries in different professions, the handful of feminine officers within the international service challenged this and different antiquated notions that discriminated in opposition to them. The division gave means on the unofficial marriage ban in 1974, permitting ladies to marry and providing to reinstate those that had been pressured out earlier.

By then, few of those that had left needed to return. However Ms. Oakley did. She had spent the intervening 16 years because the spouse of a international service officer, Robert B. Oakley, finishing up the myriad social, diplomatic and managerial duties that the division anticipated of wives beneath its “two for the worth of 1” motto. She additionally raised their two kids.

As soon as she was reinstated, she and her husband grew to become one of many international service’s earliest so-called tandem {couples}, tenting and decamping everywhere in the world — typically with one another, typically with out.

Phyllis Elsa Elliott was born on Nov. 23, 1934, in Omaha. Her mom, Elsa (Kerkow) Elliott, taught highschool math and chemistry. Her father, Thomas M. Elliott, was a salesman for the Rawlings Sporting Items Firm; his promotions took the household to Columbus, Ohio, and to St. Louis.

Phyllis was all the time occupied with public affairs; she obtained materials from the State Division about job alternatives when she was 12. Throughout World Conflict II, she adopted the battles carefully, enthralled with historical past and geography.

At Northwestern College, she majored in political science and graduated Phi Beta Kappa in 1956. She obtained her grasp’s diploma from the Fletcher College of Regulation and Diplomacy at Tufts College in 1957 after which joined the international service.

She was finishing her French language coaching and ready for her first abroad project when she met Bob Oakley, one other younger officer in coaching. They determined to marry, figuring out full properly that her profession could be over earlier than it started.

“We accepted that discrimination with out batting an eyelash,” she mentioned in a 2000 oral historical past for the Affiliation for Diplomatic Research and Coaching.

Mr. Oakley was despatched to Sudan in Could 1958. The younger couple had been married in a registrar’s workplace in Cairo in June, then started their lives collectively in Khartoum.

His subsequent posting was the Ivory Coast. Then he was despatched to Vietnam, the place households weren’t allowed to observe. Ms. Oakley and the kids spent that point in Shreveport, La., the place her husband’s household lived, and she or he taught American historical past at Centenary Faculty. She later attributed her want to rejoin the international service partially to the enjoyment she had present in instructing.

“It was good to find I nonetheless had a mind that I might use,” she mentioned within the oral historical past.

After Mr. Oakley left Vietnam in 1967, the household reunited and moved to Paris; then New York, the place he labored on the United Nations; then Beirut, the place they lived till 1974.

That was the yr the State Division dropped its ban on married ladies, and Ms. Oakley was reinstated, in Washington. Her specialties included Arab-Israeli relations and the Panama Canal Treaty.

When her husband obtained his first appointment as ambassador, to Zaire in 1979, Ms. Oakley went with him, however as an worker of the USA Data Company and never beneath his direct purview. It marked the primary time a spouse had labored in her husband’s mission.

He subsequent went to Somalia in 1982. As an alternative of becoming a member of him there, Ms. Oakley returned to Washington and rose to a midlevel job on the Afghan desk. Secretary of State George P. Shultz noticed her speaking about Afghanistan on “The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour” one evening and was so impressed that when a gap arose, he named her the division’s deputy spokesperson. She was the primary lady within the job and have become a broadly recognizable determine delivering televised briefings.

She held the job from 1986 till 1989, when her husband was appointed ambassador to Pakistan. They didn’t wish to be separated once more, so she took a job in Islamabad at the USA Company for Worldwide Improvement, which ruffled some feathers.

“I feel everybody acknowledged that I would know extra about Afghan politics than anybody else within the mission,” she mentioned within the oral historical past, “however there was the sensation that because the ambassador’s spouse, I used to be being foisted on them.”

After she retired from the State Division in 1999, she taught on the Johns Hopkins College of Superior Worldwide Research, at Mount Holyoke Faculty and at Northwestern.

Along with her son, Ms. Oakley is survived by her daughter, Mary Kress, and 5 grandchildren. Her husband died in 2014.

On the finish of her oral historical past, Ms. Oakley thought of what might need occurred if she had not been sidelined within the Nineteen Fifties, or if she hadn’t married.

“I feel I might have had a very good profession,” she mentioned, “however I don’t assume it will have been as wealthy and rewarding.”

[ad_2]