The jury deliberates for a second day in the trial of Elizabeth Holmes.

Jurors are set to deliberate for a second day on Tuesday within the fraud trial of Elizabeth Holmes, the founding father of the blood testing start-up Theranos.

Ms. Holmes, who has pleaded not responsible, faces 11 counts of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Closing arguments within the case concluded final week. On Monday, jurors started deliberating at round 8:30 a.m. They left the courthouse round 4 p.m.

If the jury of eight males and 4 ladies doesn’t attain a verdict on Tuesday, further time is scheduled for Thursday. Additional days can be scheduled on Thursday if wanted.

The deliberations are the ultimate stage of the almost four-month trial, which has drawn lengthy traces of spectators keen to observe a high-profile Silicon Valley entrepreneur defend herself in a case seen as a referendum on start-up tradition.

Earlier than her firm faltered, Ms. Holmes, 37, exemplified the genius founder. She based Theranos in 2003, dropped out of Stanford College the following 12 months to give attention to the corporate and raised $945 million from traders. At its peak, Theranos was valued at $9 billion.

Ms. Holmes additionally bought her entrepreneurial imaginative and prescient and styled herself as a Steve Jobs-like founder, right down to carrying a uniform of black turtlenecks. She grew to become a billionaire on paper, graced the covers of many magazines and was extensively celebrated.

However a 2015 Wall Avenue Journal investigation discovered that Theranos had inflated a lot of its claims about its know-how and enterprise relationships. The corporate formally shut down in 2018.

A verdict within the case boils right down to intent. Prosecutors argued that Ms. Holmes purposely deceived traders and sufferers as she sought investments and enterprise for her start-up. The protection sought to color her as a well-meaning entrepreneur whose failure was not a criminal offense.

Testimony from Ms. Holmes anchored the protection’s case. She blamed senior lab staff for her firm’s issues, argued that her personal actions have been misunderstood and mentioned she believed the claims she had made about Theranos’s know-how. She additionally mentioned Ramesh Balwani, her ex-boyfriend and Theranos’s former chief working officer, had emotionally and bodily abused her, accusations he has denied.